Understand agent exposure
Assess agent identities, delegated permissions, connected tools, and sensitive workflows to understand where risk may arise.
Autonomous AI agents introduce operational, security, and compliance risk when they access tools, credentials, and business systems. Candor Agent Defense helps organizations manage that risk through runtime identity, scoped authority, threat containment, and verifiable evidence, so teams can govern actions, not just prompts.
AI agents can act across systems at machine speed. Candor helps security leaders identify where agent authority creates exposure, establish enforceable boundaries, and retain evidence for oversight and response.
Assess agent identities, delegated permissions, connected tools, and sensitive workflows to understand where risk may arise.
Apply scoped authorization, runtime action checks, revocation, and containment to help limit unauthorized or unsafe agent activity.
Preserve tamper-evident records of governed decisions to support risk reviews, incident investigations, and compliance preparation.
An agent is not merely a chatbot. It can act. Traditional security and prompt filtering alone may not answer whether an agent is authorized to perform a particular operation right now.
An agent may continue trying to use credentials after its permissions or identity should have been revoked.
Agents can reach APIs, data or systems beyond the intended scope of their assigned task.
A compromised parent agent can put downstream agents and delegated work at risk.
Untrusted instructions or slow-burn conversation manipulation can redirect an otherwise authorized agent.
Stopping an agent process is not the same as invalidating its authority across protected action paths.
Security reviewers need to know what happened, what policy applied, and where the evaluation coverage ended.
Candor describes a two-plane design: one plane evaluates agent identity and delegated authority; the other evaluates the safety of actions. Both depend on integrating the relevant action paths into governance.
Apply identity, credential and permission checks to governed agent actions instead of trusting an agent's own assertions.
Invalidate compromised authority, including affected delegation trees, and support human-controlled recovery.
Use known-pattern checks and semantic evaluation to address malicious requests and longer-running manipulation attempts.
Record governed decisions in a tamper-evident ledger to support security reviews, incident investigation, and audit preparation.
Answer enterprise buyer questions about identity, revocation, permissions, runtime controls and audit evidence.
Govern agents that interact with internal APIs, customer workflows, operational tools and sensitive systems.
Protect interactive agents and AI characters exposed to adversarial user behavior during live sessions.
Explore selected results from Candor’s internal security exercises, including agent revocation, runtime evaluation, and delegated-authority containment. Discovery helps establish how these controls apply to your environment.
In a compromised-supervisor drill, all ten affected agents lost authority.
Reported endurance run; 90th-percentile decision latency was 2.4 seconds on the local model.
Revocation, scope and unapproved-destination scenarios contained in a local test range.
Every AI environment has unique workflows and integration requirements. During Discovery, Candor maps the action paths to protect, evaluates control coverage, and identifies practical next steps for deployment.
Candor Agent Defense helps teams evaluate agent identities, permissions, delegation, and action paths; apply runtime security controls where integrated; and document governed decisions. Discovery can help identify exposure and prioritize deployment.
It is the practice of securing autonomous software agents that use credentials, tools, APIs and business systems. Controls include agent identity, authorization, monitoring, revocation, containment and auditability.
Prompt filtering evaluates content. Runtime security additionally checks whether an agent is allowed to perform a specific action against a specific resource, and can enforce revocation and containment when integrated into the action path.
Yes. Candor's Discovery engagement uses observation-only mode. It records what the controls would have flagged while leaving enforcement for a separate decision.
Candor describes local-model and self-hosted deployment options. The actual data flow and hosting model depend on the agreed integration and should be confirmed during Discovery.
Candor provides documented security controls and test evidence that can support your team’s risk assessments and security reviews. Ask us about available framework mappings and evidence during Discovery.
Each deployment is planned around your environment. Your team provides information about the target agents, frameworks, infrastructure and existing controls so Candor can define an authorized Discovery scope and identify integration requirements. The deployment plan specifies the protected action paths, validation tests and any remaining gaps. Sensitive credentials and private keys should not be submitted through the initial contact form.
Identify agent exposure, prioritize runtime controls, and build an evidence-backed path to managing operational and security risk.